• Hepatitis Virus (Hepatitis C Virus, Hep C, HCV, Hepatitis B Virus, Hep B, HBV, etc.)
• Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)
• Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
• Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)
• Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
• Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV)

It takes 4-6 weeks from the time you start taking Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin to time you start seeing results. Unlike some drugs, the changes with the natural remedy are gradual, and sometimes easily missed.

You should not stop taking Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin. If you stop, your symptoms may come back or get worse. As a natural product that was shown to have no side effects, it is suitable for long term use.
Since 1 bottle will last for 1 month, we recommend you order 2 bottles of Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin. 

As far as we know, Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin is the only product that targets latent viruses in the body. In addition, the Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin formula is the only antiviral natural product that was tested in clinical studies that were published in peer-reviewed important scientific journals. See here, here, here, here, and here. These scientific publications mean that you don’t to have to take our word for it. It also means that you can ignore what fake customers and masked competitors, such as pharmaceutical companies and sellers of untested and unproven natural remedies, write in various forums and message boards. 

The publication of these studies means that now you have clinical data you can trust.

There are many types of blood tests, such as tests that measure the concentration of certain enzymes, and tests that measure the concentrations of certain antibodies. The most common tests measure the viral load indirectly by measuring the concentration of the body antibodies to some viral proteins. 

Please remember that the antibody based tests are very slow to react. Sometimes you might need to wait a few months, or even years, to see results with these tests. You feel an improvement much faster than you see results with the antibody tests. These tests are slow to show changes in the antibodies concentration since our body tends to keep the level of antibodies high even after the viral DNA is down. In contrast, direct tests of the viral DNA, such as PCR tests (which are rare and expensive) are much faster in showing changes in viral DNA. 

Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin includes five natural ingredients: Camellia Sinensis Extract, Quercetin, Licorice Extract, Cinnamomum Extract, and Selenium. The Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin formula is patent protected.

The key to your health is to reduce the number of latent viruses in your body to harmless levels. Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin was designed to target latent viruses. To the best of our knowledge, no other medications or supplements are effective against latent viruses. 

You should not stop taking Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin. If you stop, your symptoms may come back. As a natural product that was shown to have no side effects, it is suitable for long term use.

So far we have no reports of any side effects.

No. We do not recommend Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin for pregnant women. We have not tested it in pregnant women, and we don’t know the effects of the product during pregnancy. If you already take the supplement, we recommend you stop taking it before getting pregnant, and start taking again after you deliver your baby.

polyDNA is the company that developed Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin. The Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin formula is the first formula of its Science-Based approach. To identify the Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin ingredients, the scientists at polyDNA used the scientific method developed by Dr. Hanan Polansky. We scanned the scientific literature, analyzed thousands of papers using our proprietary bioinformatics-based computer program, and identified the most effective and safe natural ingredients. Some of the laboratory and clinical studies, which were published in scientific journals, and show that these natural ingredients have a strong antiviral effect, are described here.

If the website claims that the dietary supplement “prevents,” “treats,” or “cures” a disease, or it claims that the dietary supplement can be used instead of a drug, or it claims that the dietary supplement decreases a side effect of a drug, then….

…then, this website is breaking the law. 

Unless…. 

Unless the company that sells the dietary supplement possesses “competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.” (The quote is taken from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41). 

Reliable scientific evidence is evidence found in peer-reviewed papers published in scientific or medical journals. Information found in newspapers, magazines, forums, and other types of general media is NOT reliable scientific evidence. The most reliable scientific evidence is a report of a clinical study that tested the safety and efficacy of the supplement. If the company doesn’t have this type of evidence, then, according to the FDA, the claim made by the company is “falsely claiming to treat or prevent” a disease or a symptom of a disease.

To summarize, without reliable scientific evidence, the claim is false, and you should not believe it! 

Some companies that sell dietary supplements list studies that tested the ingredients, but not the supplement itself. For example, a dietary supplement may include an extract of Shiitake Mushroom, together with other ingredients. The website lists a scientific study that shows that the Shiitake Mushroom extract has some beneficial effect. This is valuable information. 

However, much more valuable is a published clinical study that tested the dietary supplement itself, that is, the entire formula with all its ingredients at the doses taken by the users. A clinical study that tested the treatment itself is the gold standard of the medical community.

To summarize, the relevancy of the evidence should determine the level of trust. More relevant evidence means more trust. Less relevant evidence, such studies on animals, or studies that tested only some of the ingredients, or studies that used much higher or lower dosages, mean less trust in the claims made on the website. The most trusted evidence is a published clinical study that tested the dietary supplement itself.

When a dietary supplement has many ingredients, the capsule includes a very low concentration of each ingredient. After all, a capsule has a limited space. A basic principle, known to every biologist, is that an ingredient has to be taken at a certain concentration to have an effect. At lower concentrations, the ingredient will have no effect (and at a too high of a concentration, it can be toxic!). This means that a dietary supplement loaded with many ingredients will most likely have no beneficial effect. 

To summarize, be very skeptical when you see a dietary supplement loaded with many ingredients! Again, before you trust the claims make by the seller, ask to see a published clinical study.

Customer testimonials are usually found on the company website, or in user forums. 

First, it is important to note that it is illegal to post customer testimonials that use words like “prevent,” “treat,” or “cure” on a company website without supporting relevant scientific evidence. See discussion above.

Second, let us remember that, in many cases, these customer testimonials are fake. Many “customer testimonials,” which recommend the product are written by the company itself, and therefore are fake. Also, many “customer testimonials,” which criticize the product, are written by competitors, and therefore are also fake.

That fact alone should tell you NOT to trust any “customer testimonials.”

Even when you read a customer testimonial that you are sure was written by a real customer, you should still be very skeptical. Consider a case where a customer says that the dietary supplement did not work. Why didn’t it work? Is it because the supplement is ineffective? Or is it because the customer did not follow directions, such as taking it for one month instead of two, taking it every now and then instead of every day, taking it once a day instead of two, etc. 

In summary, since there is no way to know who wrote the testimonials and why, we strongly suggest to ignore all of them, both the critical and the positive. As we said before, we strongly urge you to only trust clinical studies that were published in scientific journals.

Topical treatments, such as creams, foams, gels, lotions, or ointments, can be effective in targeting the active viruses locally in the abnormal growth. However, unlike Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin, topical treatments are ineffective against latent viruses. They are also ineffective in targeting viruses elsewhere in your body.

The warning letter was sent to polyDNA on April 28, 2011. See here. The issues mentioned in this letter were considered, and according to Lilac Corp’s attorneys, the Gene-Eden-VIR/Novirin website is in full compliance with the requirements of the FDA and FTC.

Note that the letter warns against using particular words or claims on the websites, which were found at the addresses gene-eden.com and polydna.com. These websites are no longer available.

The warning letter does NOT make any statements against the Gene-Eden-VIR product itself, against the ingredients, or against the label on the bottle. 

Consider the following section from the letter (see underlined words): 

“This is to advise you that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reviewed your websites at the internet addresses, www.polyDNA.com and www.gene-eden.com in March 2011. FDA has determined that the product “Gene-Eden” is promoted for conditions that cause the product to be a drug under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that the product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. The marketing of the product with these claims violates the Act.”

In other words, the FDA letter does not warn the public against the Gene-Eden-VIR product. It only warns the public against certain wordings on the gene-eden.com and polydna.com websites.

But even the legal argument against these wordings is unfounded.

Please also note the phrase “The therapeutic claims on your website establish that the product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.”

According to Lilac Corp’s attorneys, the officials at both the FDA and FTC erred in their legal arguments. The original websites at the adresses gene-eden.com and polydna.com said that the Gene-Eden product targets latent viruses. Note the word latent. Even according to the FDA itself, a latent virus is not a disease. See the following quote from the FDA website:

“Some viruses, however, can enter a state known as latency in which the virus is not being replicated. In the latent state, the virus does not cause disease.”

So, since a latent virus is not a disease, the Gene-Eden product, unlike what the FDA says in its warning letter, “The therapeutic claims on your website (DO NOT) establish that the product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.” And therefore, “The marketing of the product with these claims (DOES NOT) violates the Act.”

The letter also explains why the wordings on the original website “violate the Act.” It says that the claims made on the website are not supported by scientific evidence (see underlined words).

“In addition, it is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., to advertise that a product can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.” Recently, several clinical studies were published in peer reviewed medical journals that provide “competent and reliable scientific evidence substantiating” that the claims that Gene-Eden-VIR decreases symptoms of a viral infection are true.